Great sphinx of giza carbon dating
The traditional sources for this study are: ancient records and inscriptions, radio-carbon dating and archaeo-astronomy.Each of theses methods has its own inherent problems associated to it as an accurate means of determination.
The two versions do not agree on names, or on the counting of years.
To give just one example, Syncellus, who copied Africanus' list, wrote, "The twenty-fourth dynasty, Bocchoris of Sais, for six years: in his reign a lamb spoke [a short gap in the manuscript] 990 years." Meanwhile Eusebius wrote, "Bocchoris of Sais for 44 years: in his reign a lamb spoke.
Total, 44 years." We are left guessing whether the XXIV dynasty lasted for 6 years, 44, or 990.
The names and ages Manetho gave for the kings of the two dynasties we know the most about, the eighteenth and nineteenth, were proven wrong in almost every instance when compared with the evidence left by the pharaohs themselves. Breasted to describe Manetho's history as "a late, careless and uncritical compilation, which can be proven wrong from the contemporary monuments in the vast majority of cases, where such monuments have survived.
While the Kings-lists are only able to offer us the sequence of Pharaohs, there have been two radiocarbon studies on the Giza complex which allowing us to put dates to the names on the list. In the 1980s several ancient Egyptian monuments, including the Great Pyramid, were radiocarbon dated.
Radiocarbon dating cannot be applied to stone, but it can be used to date fragments of organic material, such as wood and charcoal, which are sometimes found embedded in the mortar between the stone blocks.
Originally listing over 300 kings, it is written in a fine literate hand around 1200 BC.
It lists the dynasties of the kings with the lengths of each reign in years, months and days.
The list also has no record of Kings from the second intermediate period.Tags: Adult Dating, affair dating, sex dating